AI risk and readiness assessment
Understand exposure, maturity, and the controls already in place across data, access, models, vendors, and workflows.
AI security and governance
We help organizations understand AI risk across data, models, vendors, workflows, access, and people, and build practical controls that support adoption without unnecessary friction.
AI security and governance work can be combined with the FPA Intelligence Platform to track risk alongside the transformation roadmap.
Four pillars
Governance is most useful when it is specific: which data, which access, which vendors, and who answers for each.
Define what AI systems may reach, how prompts and outputs are handled, and how identity and privilege stay controlled as adoption spreads.
Set approval, review, and documentation expectations for the models and third-party tools teams want to use.
Connect AI risk to the risk, audit, and compliance processes the organization already runs, rather than creating a parallel program.
Track which use cases are live, what data they touch, and where new risk appears as the estate grows.
Service areas
Engaged individually or as one program, depending on where your exposure and regulatory pressure sit.
Understand exposure, maturity, and the controls already in place across data, access, models, vendors, and workflows.
Define decision rights, review gates, documentation, and accountability for AI use across the organization.
Set clear rules for what may enter AI systems, how outputs are stored, and how sensitive information is protected.
Review who and what can reach AI tools, data, and downstream systems, and reduce standing privilege where it is not needed.
Assess vendors and models against data handling, retention, dependency, transparency, and exit considerations.
Review how models and automated workflows behave in practice, including failure modes and the points where human oversight is required.
Write policies people can actually follow, covering approved use, prohibited use, and escalation paths.
Support assessment of AI-enabled applications, integrations, APIs, access paths, prompt-handling controls, and connected workflows for security weaknesses. Testing is performed only with explicit client authorization and an agreed scope.
Organize documentation and controls so they hold up to audit, customer, and regulatory questions as requirements evolve.
Support structured adversarial testing of AI systems and workflows to identify prompt-injection exposure, data leakage, unsafe behavior, excessive agency, misuse paths, and other failure modes before wider adoption.
We help organizations identify, reduce, govern, and monitor AI risk across data, access, models, vendors, workflows, and people. We also design controls that support adoption rather than blocking it.
We do not describe AI adoption as risk-free, and we do not claim that risk can be eliminated. The goal is informed, governed exposure that the organization has chosen deliberately.
We share detailed information about our security practices, data handling, and delivery approach during evaluation, under NDA where required.
Security and governance engagements are run with your risk, legal, technology, and business owners in the room, so the controls that come out are ones your teams will actually operate.
We assess what is exposed today, design the governance that matches your risk appetite, and leave your teams able to run it.
Start with one business unit, department, or strategic priority.